It’s no secret that the introduction of online national park campsite booking systems has not been a hit with all grey nomads.
Indeed, many find it incredibly frustrating trying to deal with not-always-easy-to navigate websites, discovering popular campsites booked out months in advance … and then finding stacks of empty sites at supposedly fully-reserved campgrounds.
While there are those who enjoy the ‘peace of mind’ of securing a camping spot well in advance, most long-term travellers mourn the loss of one thing above all others … spontaneity.
The Big Lap is notoriously – and joyously – unpredictable. It can be affected by the weather, by road conditions, by the places you find, the people you meet, and just how you feel.
How can grey nomads commit to being in a certain place thousands of kilometres away months in advance when they don’t even want to plan where they’re going to spend the next night? Australia is not alone in facing these issues.
In the US state of California, a bill has just been introduced that would financially punish people who haven’t cancelled and then don’t show up at their reserved campsite, and it would also bar consistent no-shows from being able to make future reservations.
And in Montana, assemblyman Steve Gunderson has launched legislation in the state legislature which also aims to put the spontaneity back into the camping experience. It would see 20% of camping spots kept away from online booking and left exclusively for first-come, first-served ‘walk-in’ users.
“One cannot just load up the family into a vehicle anymore We want to be free and just head out as the sites are almost non-existent due to full-to-capacity campsites,” Mr Gunderson told the Grey Nomads. “Those sites that have online reservations typically will be reserved, but the sites are open and unused due to no shows!”
Australian grey nomads like Nigel Shotton, who strongly dislikes online booking, says it’s time steps were taken here to help spontaneous campers.
He says national parks should always have about 30% of sites left for ‘just-turn-up’ campers; that the booking system should only be used during peak holiday periods; that camp hosts or park rangers should always be on site to manage campgrounds; and that any booking system should accurately reflect all site sizes, accessibility and availability.
“National parks are owned by the people for the people, and the parks services were set up to provide a service to the people, and to manage the resources and environment for the people,” Mr Shotton said. “National parks or conservation parks should not be treated in the same vein as a hotel … but this is what many of the parks booking systems are trying to achieve.”
It’s now many years since online bookings for national park campsites were introduced … and it’s been a steep learning curve for all concerned.
National parks authorities now acknowledge that the systems first put in place had their share of imperfections. However, they say they have since largely ironed out the wrinkles. Translation. Online booking is here to stay.
The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) says its ‘booking system has been a success’ and that, outside of peak season, availability was not an issue.
“NPWS is continuing to explore avenues for ensuring booked sites are used,” a spokesperson said. “Visitors who cancel get a partial refund or can transfer the money paid to a future date up to the date of arrival … people who don’t turn up, forego the fees paid.”
The Queensland Department of Environment and Science (DES) said that it was looking at upgrading its system again.
“There is always room for improvement,” DES said.
While research showed 85% of users were satisfied with its online booking, DES said it knew there were still issues.
“Sometimes changes occur in people’s travel plans and booked sites might go unoccupied,” a spokesperson said. “However, our legislation provides that if a customer has paid for camping, they have a valid permit, whether they attend the camping area or not.”
The National Parks and Wildlife Service South Australia says it continues to improve its system and visitors can now make changes to their own booking online.
“There is a fantastic community of people enjoying national parks experiences and we encourage everyone who has a booking to be mindful of others and cancel if they can’t attend,” a spokesperson said. “It’s great to see most campers do this.”
The authority said it currently had no plans to reserve any camping spots for spontaneous travellers, or to ban people who persistently book campsites and then don’t show up.
Mark Knower, Parks Victoria Senior Manager Marketing and Customer Experience, told the Grey Nomads that its new booking system was a hit.
“We think it is much easier to search for availability and choose a campground that suits your needs,” he said. “But there are always ways to improve and we’d welcome any feedback your readers have.”
WA’s Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions’ (DBCA) said upgrades made last June had made it easier for campers to cancel their bookings, although it acknowledged some people who had paid in full were still not turning up.
“While refinements to the upgraded system are still being made, it is expected the changes to Park Stay WA will reduce the number of bookings that are made but go unused,” a DBCA spokesperson said.
Are you a Grey Nomad member yet? Click here to find out about the discounts, competitions and other benefits on offer.
I agree with Mr. SHOTTON. There should be sites left for turn ups as not only grey nomads like to do spontaneous camping, families do too. And as grey nomads who have camped in National Parks for over 45 years and were always able to turn up and pay the collector, camping was stress free. Also not all grey nomads do computer banking or use cards for payment. We rang NPs to enquire of our options and was met with rudeness about our wish to pay cash at the sites. Nps want to employ as little staff as possible so campers are the ones who have to wear it. A sad situation for those if us who love camping in NPs.
What research!!!! I call BS in the 85% being happy. I’m travelling WA and everyone I have spoken too are not happy. Not 1 person thinks this is a great system. Still empty sites but no vacancies. Website hard to negotiate. Can’t get reception to book. A lot of unhappy people. Things need to change so everyone gets a fair go!!!
Totally agree with you. Reception in W.A. is often non existent. Many have also said they have turned up to their booking only to find a non booker in their spot, and the invader refusing to move.
It was so much nicer when there was no booking system just an honor box or a ranger to pick up the fee. We now avoid the going to the national parks as we like to travel without the worry of having to be at a specific place at a specific date and time. I don’t like the fact that they have your money regardless, seems to me that NP are making it a money making scheme not really caring if you turn up or not as long as they get the fees.
NSW surveyed me and told them not happy camper with their online system. I am absolutely sure they will ignore me
On the upside, I’m glad to have a site reserved for me at the end of a travel day. And I don’t mind booking in advance for NPs, there are plenty of other walk-in options besides parks.
As they want us to leave by a certain time and not arrive before a certain time I would like any empty space after say 4pm to be available for free access if I have a np pass.
What many don’t realise is those that are running National Parks have one over riding objective and that is to keep people, horses,dogs, 4 WD, Caravans out of the Parks.
They have no interest in anything that would allow or make it easier to access parks so don’t expect any changes quickly.
We have used this booking system and while it was nice to know that you had a booked site !! We did also have the experience of the site being occupied when we arrived and they took many hours to vacate it !!! Maybe needs a bit more policing However we also like arriving to first in option !!!
It is very ineffective-people book sites up to 12 months ahead -don’t turn up-sites empty but no-one else can use them or book
Most NP personnel who put these systems in place have never ventured out of their city office and have NO idea at all
In outback when travelling with no service it is very hard to book somewhere
Lawn Hill was totally booked out when we were there so stayed at Adels Grove-in fact for 4nights we were there Lawn Hill had 2 sites occupied when online it was booked out
I am unhappy that National Parks in SA now have a 5 day maximum. I think at least a week or longer is more appropriate. Travel from a long distance you want to see longer.
I agree there should be sites kept aside for those spontaneous travellers. We are currently travelling WA and have not once been able to book online…the park stay booking system needs to work!
Too much planning for something that should not be that complicated. Camping is not an exact science. You got to a hotel for that. Drive and stop when you want to, it’s that simple.
Maybe if the site is not occupied by 3.30pm then it is available for whoever comes first.
I hate the online booking system. I am flat out knowing where I’ll be tomorrow. At the very least there should be full online access at the site so you can book when I arrive. The online booking system has led to chronic forward booking and then not turning up. This needs to be stamped out. If no online connection on the site then system should be first in gets the sites
Not a fan of the online booking system. On the first week of the school holidays we had 3 nights booked for sculptures in the scrub campsite. We would have liked to stay at the salt caves campsite as well but it was booked out. The first night we were the only ones who had booked there. The next 2 nights, 2 other campers turned up bit still 4 empty sites. We visited the salt caves campsite and no one was camped there. Last year, we tried to book a site at Chilli Beach but it was all booked out. When we visited, hardly any campsites were being used. Bring back first in first served. Originally, the booking system was to keep track of people due to covid but that reason in no longer needed.
Far too difficult… have been trying but gave up
Yes definitely leave sites for spontaneous travelers.
Repeat no shows fined. (Probably difficult to police)
It’s not only a case of no shows it’s a case of I can’t book when I’m there due to lack of wifi
I went to a site that had 54 sites at about 5 pm and there were 25 site’s vacant